Return to CreateDebate.comwdc1101 • Join this debate community

1101


Debate Info

16
23
Yes. No.
Debate Score:39
Arguments:42
Total Votes:39
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes. (16)
 
 No. (23)

Debate Creator

ehawkins(408) pic



Should vaccines be required?

Yes.

Side Score: 16
VS.

No.

Side Score: 23
1 point

People think that because they don't get sick, that they don't need to be vaccinated. What people don't understand is that vaccines are used not only to protect themselves from sickness, but to protect people around them who have weak immune systems caused by other diseases. If someone doesn't get vaccinated, they may not get sick, but they are putting already weak people at risk for a possibly fatal disease.

Side: Yes.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

So, I should get vaccinated for other people? What about my own personal rights about what I put into my body? Aren't you basically trying to take away my right to do what I want with my own body?

Side: No.
Abbywestrum(12) Clarified
1 point

You have every right to put what you want into your body, but in this situation, there is not a strong reason why you shouldn't want to help others. This is a life or death situation, and a vaccine is not going to harm you. Even if you don't get sick personally, you could be saving someone's life by not exposing them to a disease.

Side: Yes.
18mevans(6) Disputed
1 point

It doesn't matter what other people have for immune system strength if you don't get sick. Simply put, if someone is completely healthy, there is nothing bad to be transmitted. Anyways, if someone doesn't want to get sick, they should get vaccinated themselves so in wouldn't matter.

Side: No.
Abbywestrum(12) Clarified
1 point

What you aren't understanding is that people can still carry a disease and spread the germs if they aren't showing symptoms or feeling sick. By not vaccinating, they are increasing the chances of spreading a sickness, therefore increasing the chances of harming people who's immune systems are too weak to handle a vaccine. Some people aren't able to get vaccines because they are too sick; it isn't about whether or not they want to get vaccinated.

Side: Yes.
1 point

Vaccines should, by law, be required. Not only is it important to the welfare of the child, but it's important to the welfare of the other children that child interacts with. Some children can't have vaccines due to medical issues and some children are too young yet to have vaccines. A child that doesn't get a vaccine and contracts one of the diseases can spread it to the other children and those children can bring it home to their too young siblings causing them to become super ill and possibly die. In addition, if a child is allergic to the vaccines or can't for other medical reasons could die if a well child with parents who aren't educated enough don't get their child vaccinated and infect other children.

Side: Yes.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

There are proven side effects to vaccinations. Who is going to pay for the funeral of my children when he or she dies from these unproven "medications". Big Phrama has doctors in their pockets, and there are too many vaccines out there. I don't want my child to be a pin cushion.

Side: No.
Evan_kel(12) Disputed
1 point

Cdc.gov has more information about how safe and effective vaccines can be. In addition, there are financial aides out there to help with funeral costs to answer your question, but your child will not die from vaccines. Doctors have pamphlets and sheets that tell you all the ingredients in the said vaccines and you can always ask questions. Physically shots are pretty painless compared to kids being in sports.

Side: Yes.
1 point

Vaccines should be required. They should be required so everyone can be healthiest they can be and not spread the disease to anyone around them. Vaccines can produce around 90-100% immunity. Why wouldn't you get a vaccine when most insurances cover the whole cost.

Side: Yes.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

So, I should be okay with the insurance paying the whole cost to cause illness and problems in my child's life? No thank you. I would rather have to pay to keep these harmful products out of my child's life. Why should the government get to decide how I raise my kid?

Side: No.
TabtihaJanke(6) Disputed
1 point

Not getting the vaccine and getting a disease is more of a "bad product" to have in your child. The government is not telling you how to raise your kid. They're telling you how to protect your child. Don't you want your child happy and healthy.

Side: Yes.
1 point

Vaccines are a crucial aspect to maintaining a healthy population-locally, nationally, and internationally. There have been numerous lethal diseases that have been eradicated such as Polio, Smallpox, and Malaria. But, because parents and guardians have either chosen to not vaccinate, or have not had the opportunity to vaccinate their children, diseases such as the vaccine-preventable case of Measles. If you are unvaccinated and have come in contact with a case of Measles, you have a 90% chance of contracting it.

Side: Yes.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

Yes, vaccines have "cured" those things, but we are no vaccinating for everything. They are making parents feel like horrible creatures for questioning one of the biggest corporations in the world. They are in this to make money. I want actual proof that all the other vaccines are doing more than lining the pockets of Big Pharma.

Side: No.
LilaLoh(3) Disputed
1 point

According to the Center For Disease Control, children are regularly vaccinated for Chickenpox, Diphtheria, Influenza (Flu), Hepatitus A and B, Hib, Measles, Mumps, Polio, Pneumococcal, Rotavirus, Rubella, Tetanus, and Pertussis. Yes, at certain places a typical Flu shot will cost about $31-$35 without insurance, but just like any other resourceful and thoughtful planning and shopping, a person without insurance would be able to receive the Flu shot for as little as $15 at Sam's Club.

Side: Yes.
1 point

I do not believe that vaccines should be required. I believe this because not everyone has health insurance or the money to pay for it. Another reason is because some people could be allergic to the vaccine required, causing an allergic reaction which could get really bad. People could also not even want the vaccine because the chance of getting some of the illnesses and stuff is probably really low. So why get it if the odds of getting it are low?

Side: No.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

The odds are also low that you will get hit by a car, but you don't walk down the middle of the street, do you? You do things to avoid dangers. You don't run head first toward the thing that might kill you because it may cause some irritation.

Side: Yes.
1 point

As Americans, the act of choosing is a given right. That right needs to be enforced and not limited. Americans shouldn't be forced to have a vaccine. Some people's immune systems aren't strong enough the way it is to withstand a virus being sent into their body.

Side: No.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

People also have the choice to join the KKK. Some choices are stupid and wrong.

Side: Yes.
18tmeeks(7) Disputed
1 point

That doesn't change the fact that the right is still there. We're not talking about people joining the KKK. Besides, people have the choice to decide what can go in their body. Not everyone can withstand a virus in their body

Side: No.
1 point

Vaccines should not be required. Why? Because it would be expensive and time consuming to make sure everyone vaccinated. Also, it should be a person's choice if they want to have a weakened strain of a virus inside their body or not. Even though vaccines can be helpful, it doesn't mean they always are. If vaccines were required it would also be difficult to decide how much everyone would pay for them, or if they had to pay at all based on their income.

Side: No.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

So it is okay to skip something because it is time consuming? I guess we should just get rid of school. It is really hard to make sure students attend class. School isn't always helpful to everyone. I think we should just stop educating our children and let them run around in the grass.

Side: Yes.
18jsnyder(9) Disputed
1 point

While school is time consuming, it is also year round and not seasonal like most vaccinations. What would you do if someone missed the deadline to get vaccinated? The government has a very difficult time trying to enforce other deadlines that are not being met.

Side: No.
1 point

Vaccines should not be required. A person should be able to choose what they put in their body; in fact, the National Vaccine Information Center says that we have the right to know what is going into our body and the freedom to chose. If a person can choose whether or not to put metal in their body, such as a piercing, they should be able to chose if they want weakened diseases introduced into their body.

Side: No.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

You do have the right about what you put in your body. However, don't other people have the right not to be killed because of what you decided NOT to put in your body. I don't want smoke blown in my face since I am not a smoker.

Side: Yes.
Kirstan16(12) Disputed
1 point

But how many people have been killed because of someone else not getting a vaccine. People are not purposely refusing a vaccine to penalize you, whereas someone who blows smoke in your face is doing it just to be annoying.

Side: No.
1 point

Vaccines should not be required for many reasons. The first reason is the vaccine can cause serious, if not deadly, side effects. these side effects include anaphylaxis, which is an allergic reaction to the vaccine. i have in fact had anaphylaxis to the tetanus shot and it is far from a party. Another very valid reason vaccines should not be required is that in several instances these "horrible" diseases that vaccines target are almost 100% harmless.

Side: No.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

So, you think that a side effect is a bigger reason that the eradication of an entire disease? If President Roosevelt could have stood up and said, "Please give me a vaccine for polio. I don't want to be in this wheel chair," I bet he would have.

Side: Yes.
rgrendahl(12) Disputed
1 point

Actually President Roosevelt wasn't in his wheelchair all the time, he would often times walk into a room to show he didn't have time for weakness. The cost of todays vaccines far outweigh the benefits and seem to be used more as a revenue generator than anything else.

Side: No.
1 point

It should be up to the person or the parent if they should be vaccinated. One reason is the person could be allergic to stuff in the vaccine and the government shouldn't get in the way of your personal decisions. Some of the side effects can be fatal, and in some cases the side effects could be worse than what the vaccine is trying to prevent.

Side: No.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

Parents have been proven to make bad decisions for children. There are crack-addicted babies, so those parents made the decision to put that chemical in their child's body. It was their choice. So, in your eyes, is it okay?

Side: Yes.
Warren10(9) Disputed
1 point

That would be why crack is illegal. It's illegal for the baby and the parent. Therefore, it is not okay for the parent to make that choice because it is illegal and not good for the baby.

Side: No.
1 point

Vaccines should not be required for a few important reasons. Some people don't get vaccines because of potential negative side affects. Studies have shown links between vaccines and autism. Vaccines may also cause the disease that it is suppose to be preventing due to the antigens in them. Vaccinations consist chemicals, metals, and lab grown antigens that some people do not want in their bodies.

Side: No.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

The study connecting autism to vaccines has been disproven, and the man who "wrote" it was stripped of his medical license.

Side: Yes.
caseymv(11) Disputed
1 point

Although there may be no connection between vaccines and autism, there are still other side effects that people may want to avoid.

Side: No.
1 point

People should not be forced to inject things into their body that they don't want. If vaccines were required, then how would hospitals enforce this rule? With the freedom to choose to be vaccinated or not, people have more control. If someone wants to be protected from an illness with a vaccine, by all means do it. But if someone wants to fight off the disease naturally, and not have any side effects of the injection, then that should be their choice.

Side: No.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

Choices are a great thing. What if I don't have the choice to get a vaccine? Some people are allergic to it, and if you don't want it put in your body and you get an illness, you give it to me. Why should I have to pay for another's selfishness?

Side: Yes.
1 point

I don't believe that all vaccines should be required. Children are required to get vaccines for school, but that doesn't mean that they have to get every vaccine out there. If a parent doesn't think the flu shot helps, then they don't have to let their children get the flu shot. Its up to the person who is getting the shot or the parent of the person getting the shot. Some vaccine don't help, instead they give them the thing that they were being vaccinated for.

Side: No.
ehawkins(408) Disputed
1 point

This is much bigger than the flu shot. People are spreading lies about autism and vaccines. People need to think about more than themselves when they are considering vaccinating. That's what happened in the 50s, which is why no one is in a wheelchair due to polio.

Side: Yes.
1 point

People should not be forced to inject things into their body that they don't want. If vaccines were required, then how would hospitals enforce this rule? With the freedom to choose to be vaccinated or not, people have more control. If someone wants to be protected from an illness with a vaccine, by all means do it. But if someone wants to fight off the disease naturally, and not have any side effects of the injection, then that should be their choice.

Side: No.